The definitive guide to gene editing.
Menu
Home Learn News Ask the Atlas
Explore Technologies Diseases Treatments Clinical Trials Companies Scientists Genes Research Institutions
Beyond medicine Agriculture Ethics Investing World map
Learn & Tools Start here Glossary A–Z Compare technologies Timeline Lists & Rankings AI Agents ★ Saved API
About About us Methodology Data Sources Editorial Policy Contact Disclaimers

🧭 Guided View
New to genetics? We explain every term as you browse, in plain English. Same pages, with the help built in.

⚡ Expert View
You already know the biology. Just the content — clean and compact, no extra explanations. This is the default view.

Interface language
Light mode

Gene-editing news

6 stories held Section: Research Every headline links to its original publisher Nothing here is written by us
New Scientist

CRISPR-armed phages help treat severe superbug infection

Bacteria-killing phage viruses souped up with DNA-destroying CRISPR appear to have helped clear up a very serious infection caused by antibiotic-resistant E. coli

The Guardian — Genetics

Deaf people excluded from gene-editing debate | Letter

There is no majority support for use of gene editing on non-life-threatening conditions, writes Tom Lichy of the British Deaf Association Your editorial ( The Guardian view on…

Aug 20, 2026
Aug 18, 2026

Not journalism — written in-house

Atlas briefs

Short summaries produced with AI assistance from our own database records. They are not reported by anyone else, carry no byline, and are kept separate from the news above for exactly that reason.

How to read the evidence levels on this site

The CRISPR Atlas assigns every record one of four evidence levels, and understanding what each means explains why the same technology can appear in very different contexts on the same site. Laboratory research, covering five Atlas pages as of Atlas records, describes work done entirely in cells or computational models, with no human or animal testing yet. Preclinical research, spanning twelve pages, means a approach has shown results in animal models or laboratory systems rigorous enough to justify asking regulators for permission to test in people, but no human trials have begun or the programme has not advanced beyond that point. Clinical research is the largest category at fifty-nine pages and covers every stage of human trials, from early Phase I safety studies through the pivotal Phase III studies required for approval. Approved treatment, with sixteen pages, is reserved for therapies that have passed regulatory review. The distinction matters because it signals how much uncertainty remains. A preclinical finding may never translate to humans; a clinical result may still fail at a later phase. Conflating these levels risks misrepresenting experimental interventions as established ones, which is why the Atlas tracks and displays them separately.

5h ago

The hardest unsolved problems

According to Atlas records, the clearest divide between approved and experimental gene-editing treatments comes down to two factors: how easily cells can be removed, edited outside the body, and returned, and whether established delivery vehicles exist for reaching the relevant tissue in living patients. Casgevy, the only approved CRISPR gene-editing treatment in the Atlas, targets sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia by editing patients' own blood stem cells outside the body. Blood cells can be extracted, edited in a laboratory dish, and reinfused — a workflow that sidesteps the hard problem of delivering editing machinery into tissues inside a living person. Diseases involving internal organs present a different challenge. Conditions such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, Huntington's disease, and Parkinson's disease remain preclinical or at discovery stage in Atlas records, partly because reaching muscle, lung, or brain with sufficient precision and safety is unsolved. Even liver-targeted in vivo programmes, which benefit from lipid nanoparticle delivery, have encountered serious safety signals, as Atlas records for the MAGNITUDE trial illustrate. Until delivery barriers are reliably overcome, regulatory approval for those conditions remains out of reach.

5h ago

What has changed most recently

According to Atlas records, the most significant recent developments span 2025 and 2026. The most recent entry, dated 2026, concerns lonvoguran ziclumeran (lonvo-z), a CRISPR-Cas9 therapy for hereditary angioedema. Positive Phase 3 results were reported for this in vivo gene editing approach, described in the Atlas as the first successful registrational trial of gene editing performed inside the body. A licence application is recorded as planned for the second half of 2026. That same year, the FDA reduced the default requirement from two adequate and well-controlled trials to one and issued draft guidance allowing improvement in a single participant to support approval in defined circumstances for ultra-rare diseases. From 2025, Atlas records document three notable developments. PM359, a prime editing therapy for chronic granulomatous disease, produced the first published clinical evidence that prime editing can engraft stem cells and restore immune function in patients; this carries a clinical research evidence level. Also in 2025, an infant with CPS1 deficiency received a base editor designed for his individual mutation and improved, though this remains experimental. A serious safety event also occurred: a participant in the Phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial died following severe liver injury, prompting a temporary clinical hold.

5h ago

Where gene editing actually stands today

As reflected in Atlas records, one CRISPR-based gene editing treatment has reached approval: Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel), which uses CRISPR-Cas9 to treat sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia. Two additional approved therapies for those same conditions — Lyfgenia and Zynteglo — use lentiviral gene addition rather than gene editing and are classified separately. At the late-stage level, four gene editing programs are in Phase III trials. Nexiguran ziclumeran targets ATTR amyloidosis, lonvoguran ziclumeran targets hereditary angioedema and reported positive Phase III results according to Atlas records, while risto-cel and BEAM-302 apply base editing to sickle cell disease and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency respectively. Several earlier-phase editing programs are active across cancer, familial hypercholesterolemia, chronic granulomatous disease, and diabetes. Despite this progress, the Atlas records show that conditions including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, hemophilia, Huntington's disease, and retinitis pigmentosa remain at preclinical or discovery stages, underscoring how much of the field's ambition has yet to move into human trials.

5h ago

Where these headlines come from

Every publisher the Atlas collects from, with how many of their stories it currently holds.

PublisherArticles heldMost recent
GEN — Genetic Engineering News 11 Aug 20, 2026
Science Daily — Gene Therapy 6 Sep 7, 2025
The Guardian — Genetics 5 Aug 5, 2026
STAT 4 Aug 20, 2026
Endpoints News 3 Aug 20, 2026
Nature Genetics 2 Aug 20, 2026
Medical Xpress — Genetics 2 Aug 19, 2026
Science Daily 2 Aug 17, 2026
MIT Technology Review 2 Aug 14, 2026
New Scientist 1 Aug 11, 2026
Science Daily — Genes 1 Jul 26, 2026
FDA 1 Jul 1, 2026

Headlines, publisher names and links only. Articles remain the property of the publishers named. Dates are the publication dates reported by each feed, in UTC. Images, where shown, are served from the publisher and belong to them.