The definitive guide to gene editing.
Menu
Home Learn News Ask the Atlas
Explore Technologies Diseases Treatments Clinical Trials Companies Scientists Genes Research Institutions
Beyond medicine Agriculture Ethics Investing World map
Learn & Tools Start here Glossary A–Z Compare technologies Timeline Lists & Rankings AI Agents ★ Saved API
About About us Methodology Data Sources Editorial Policy Contact Disclaimers

🧭 Guided View
New to genetics? We explain every term as you browse, in plain English. Same pages, with the help built in.

⚡ Expert View
You already know the biology. Just the content — clean and compact, no extra explanations. This is the default view.

Interface language
Light mode

Gene-editing news

40 stories held Every headline links to its original publisher Nothing here is written by us
STAT

STAT+: FDA approves Ultragenyx gene therapy

Regeneron wins ultra-rare disease drug approval, a validating win for mRNA research, and more biotech news from The Readout

Gene Therapy (gene addition)
Aug 20, 2026
Aug 19, 2026
10

Cell Therapy Company Aims to Pioneer Analytics Automation

BlueRock says it’s helping advance the cell therapy industry by developing an automated system for analytical auditing. They say it’s among the few systems specifically designed for this…

Aug 18, 2026
Aug 17, 2026
19

The Microbiome Field Enters Its Next Chapter

New analytical tools and microbiome-based therapies are pushing the field beyond early hype toward clinical and scientific progress. The post The Microbiome Field Enters Its Next Chapter…

Aug 14, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
25

Scientists just created female clones of male mice

Scientists have deliberately turned male mouse embryos into females for the first time. A team based in Japan used a CRISPR-based approach to remove the Y chromosome from male cells and…

Aug 11, 2026
Aug 5, 2026
Jul 26, 2026
Jul 15, 2026
29

Deaf people excluded from gene-editing debate | Letter

There is no majority support for use of gene editing on non-life-threatening conditions, writes Tom Lichy of the British Deaf Association Your editorial ( The Guardian view on gene-edited…

Jul 5, 2026
Jul 1, 2026
Jun 15, 2026
May 30, 2026
Apr 19, 2026
Sep 7, 2025
35

Scientists just made CRISPR three times more effective

Northwestern scientists have developed a new nanostructure that supercharges CRISPR’s ability to safely and efficiently enter cells, potentially unlocking its full power to treat genetic…

Aug 10, 2025
May 21, 2025
May 12, 2025
Apr 9, 2025
39

Engineering smart delivery for gene editors

A research team has developed an advanced delivery system that transports gene-editing tools based on the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system into living cells with significantly greater…

CRISPR-Cas9
Jan 28, 2025

Not journalism — written in-house

Atlas briefs

Short summaries produced with AI assistance from our own database records. They are not reported by anyone else, carry no byline, and are kept separate from the news above for exactly that reason.

How to read the evidence levels on this site

The CRISPR Atlas assigns every record one of four evidence levels, and as of Atlas records, those levels span 92 pages in total. Understanding what each means prevents a common mistake: treating experimental findings as established medicine. Laboratory research, covering five Atlas records, means work conducted in cells or animals but not yet tested in people. Preclinical research, covering 12 records, similarly describes findings that have not reached human trials, though the term often signals more advanced preparatory work. Neither level justifies conclusions about human safety or effectiveness. Clinical research, the largest tier at 59 records, means a therapy is being studied in human trials but has not been approved by a regulatory authority. Results may be promising, but trials can pause, fail, or reveal unexpected harms, as Atlas records of a 2025 trial death illustrate. Approved treatment, covering 16 records, is reserved for therapies that have cleared regulatory review. On that basis, only one gene-editing medicine, Casgevy using CRISPR-Cas9, carries that designation in Atlas records. The distinction matters because only approved treatments have met the evidentiary bar regulators require before clinical use.

19h ago

The hardest unsolved problems

As Atlas records show, the diseases with approved gene-editing treatment share a practical advantage: both sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia involve blood cells that can be removed from a patient, edited outside the body using CRISPR-Cas9, and reinfused. This ex vivo approach sidesteps one of gene editing's hardest problems — delivering molecular machinery to cells inside a living person. Conditions such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, and Huntington's disease remain preclinical partly because their target tissues, muscle, lung, and brain respectively, are far harder to reach safely and efficiently. The liver is an exception: it absorbs lipid nanoparticles readily, which is why ATTR amyloidosis and hereditary angioedema have reached Phase III with in vivo CRISPR approaches. Even there, Atlas records document a participant death from severe liver injury during the MAGNITUDE trial, illustrating that in vivo delivery carries risks absent from the ex vivo model. Evidence level, target-tissue access, and delivery technology together explain the gap between approved treatments and programmes that remain experimental.

19h ago

What has changed most recently

According to Atlas records, the most recent developments span 2025 and 2026. The furthest-reaching result, classified at the clinical research evidence level, came when lonvoguran ziclumeran (lonvo-z) produced positive Phase 3 outcomes in hereditary angioedema — recorded as the first successful registrational trial of gene editing performed inside the body. A licence application was signalled for the second half of 2026. Separately, 2025 brought the first clinical evidence for prime editing: results from PM359 in chronic granulomatous disease showed that prime-edited stem cells engraft and restore immune function previously absent in patients. Also in 2025, a base editor was designed, manufactured, and authorised for a single infant with a specific mutation; the patient improved and was discharged. On the regulatory side, also recorded for 2026, the FDA reduced its default trial requirement and issued draft guidance under which improvement in one participant could, in defined circumstances, support approval for ultra-rare individualised therapies. A serious 2025 safety event — a patient death in the MAGNITUDE trial — led to a temporary FDA clinical hold, later lifted, underscoring that permanent in vivo edits carry irreversible risk.

19h ago

Where gene editing actually stands today

As reflected in Atlas records, one CRISPR-based gene editing treatment has reached approval: Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel), which uses CRISPR-Cas9 to treat sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia. Two further approved therapies, Lyfgenia and Zynteglo, address the same blood disorders but work through lentiviral gene addition rather than gene editing and are classified separately. At the late-stage frontier, four gene editing candidates are in Phase III trials. Nexiguran ziclumeran targets ATTR amyloidosis, lonvoguran ziclumeran targets hereditary angioedema and has reported positive Phase III results according to Atlas records, while risto-cel and BEAM-302 apply base editing to sickle cell disease and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency respectively. Several earlier-phase trials are active across cancer, familial hypercholesterolemia, chronic granulomatous disease and diabetes. Despite this progress, the Atlas records conditions such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, Huntington's disease and Parkinson's disease as preclinical or discovery-stage only, and a substantial share of tracked pages sit at the preclinical research evidence level, underscoring how much of the field remains experimental.

19h ago

Where these headlines come from

Every publisher the Atlas collects from, with how many of their stories it currently holds.

PublisherArticles heldMost recent
GEN — Genetic Engineering News 11 Aug 20, 2026
Science Daily — Gene Therapy 6 Sep 7, 2025
The Guardian — Genetics 5 Aug 5, 2026
STAT 4 Aug 20, 2026
Endpoints News 3 Aug 20, 2026
Nature Genetics 2 Aug 20, 2026
Medical Xpress — Genetics 2 Aug 19, 2026
Science Daily 2 Aug 17, 2026
MIT Technology Review 2 Aug 14, 2026
New Scientist 1 Aug 11, 2026
Science Daily — Genes 1 Jul 26, 2026
FDA 1 Jul 1, 2026

Headlines, publisher names and links only. Articles remain the property of the publishers named. Dates are the publication dates reported by each feed, in UTC. Images, where shown, are served from the publisher and belong to them.