ゲノム編集の決定版ガイド。
メニュー
ホーム 学ぶ ニュース Atlasに聞く
探索する 技術 疾患 治療法 臨床試験 企業 科学者 遺伝子 研究 研究機関
医療を超えて 農業 倫理 投資 世界地図
学ぶ・ツール まずはここから 用語集 A~Z 技術を比較する タイムライン リスト・ランキング AIエージェント ★ 保存済み API
このサイトについて 私たちについて 方法論 データソース 編集方針 お問い合わせ 免責事項

🧭 ガイドビュー
遺伝学が初めてですか? 閲覧しながら、すべての用語をわかりやすく説明します。同じページに、サポートが組み込まれています。

⚡ 専門家の見解
生物学はすでにご存知の方へ。コンテンツだけをすっきりとコンパクトに、余分な説明なしでお届けします。これがデフォルト表示です。

表示言語
ライトモード

Technology · Related approach

Gene Therapy (gene addition)

Delivers a working copy of a gene into cells without changing the existing genome — the older approach that gene editing is often confused with.

Approved DNAno editingapproved
Approved treatment At least one medicine using this approach has been authorised by a national regulator for this use.

わかりやすい説明

Gene therapy and gene editing are not the same thing, and the difference is the single most useful distinction on this site. Gene therapy adds a working copy of a gene, usually carried in by a modified virus, and leaves the broken original exactly where it is. Gene editing changes the original. Adding is older, more established, and has many approved products; changing is newer and has one.

さらに深く掘り下げる

Gene addition delivers a functional transgene via viral vectors — adeno-associated virus for non-integrating delivery to non-dividing tissue, lentivirus for integrating delivery to dividing cells such as haematopoietic stem cells — or by non-viral means. The endogenous locus is untouched. AAV episomes dilute out as cells divide, which limits durability in proliferating tissue; lentiviral integration is durable but semi-random, carrying insertional-mutagenesis risk.

Where it works better than editing

When the problem is a missing protein and the mutations causing it are scattered across the gene, adding one working copy treats everybody with the condition. Editing would need a different design per mutation. This is why approved therapies for spinal muscular atrophy, inherited retinal dystrophy and haemophilia are gene addition, not editing.

Where editing wins

When the problem is a protein that is actively harmful rather than absent — a toxic gain of function — adding another copy achieves nothing; the bad one has to be silenced or removed. Editing also preserves the gene's own regulation, which matters when the amount and timing of expression is important, and it does not run out as an AAV episome does in dividing cells.

Where editing wins
A viral capsid carrying a therapeutic gene toward a cell membrane. Illustration generated for The CRISPR Atlas — a visual aid, not a photograph or a literal depiction of molecular structure.

Common questions

What is the difference between CRISPR and gene therapy?

Gene therapy adds a working copy of a gene and leaves the faulty one in place. CRISPR gene editing changes the existing DNA itself. Both are permanent for the cells they reach, both are administered once, and in ordinary speech they get used interchangeably — but they are different interventions with different risks, and regulators treat them differently.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

このページに関連するニュース

この記録に自動的に照合されました。すべての項目は掲載媒体にリンクしています。

教育目的の情報のみ このページはリファレンスであり、医療上のアドバイスではありません。研究・規制上のステータスは変わることがあります。上記の最終更新日を確認し、重要な情報は記載の一次情報源で必ずご確認ください。